Homeopathy Debunked Compilation

by Dan on January 24, 2012

Best homeopathy compilation with clips from diverse academics, comedians, and displays. Discuss on facebook for the profit of all your pals who imagine in homeopathy. Link: www.youtube.com

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

flootisboy65 January 24, 2012 at 10:33 am

Calms forty dollars directly out of your wallet

oveid January 24, 2012 at 10:46 am

The israelites, who spawned all white people, including real jews, are going to crush the talmudists, communists, satanists and other perverts and cowards along with holoCOSTianity.

Davidtheinfidel January 24, 2012 at 10:56 am

I “overdoesed” on an entire bottle of homoeopathic sleeping pills this weekend at our heretic’s BBQ. Ya, no effect.

Davidtheinfidel January 24, 2012 at 11:27 am

I “overdoesed” on an entire bottle of homoeopathic sleeping pills this weekend at our heretic’s BBQ. Ya, no effect.

VekinHighwalker January 24, 2012 at 11:32 am

Ha ha ha!!!

ParapaDrifter January 24, 2012 at 12:19 pm

@IoEstasCedonta allopathy is crap anyway. you know what they say about an ounce of prevention…

The Medical Industry is beholden to profit motive. Therein lies the lie.

Regarding Dr. Brownstein, he’s cured many ‘terminal’ people. Watch his video “Iodine: the most misunderstood nutrient” for the answer you’ve shut your eyes to.

Allopathy < Homeopathy < Biochemistry. The body will heal itself if you give it what it’s deficient in. I doubt anyone is deficient in cisplatnin or fluoride.

IoEstasCedonta January 24, 2012 at 12:29 pm

@ParapaDrifter So… a single, anecdotal case? I’m a bit underwhelmed.

IoEstasCedonta January 24, 2012 at 1:11 pm

@TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE Let me remind you of the significance of the number 602214179000000000000000 ± 30000000000000000…

ParapaDrifter January 24, 2012 at 1:13 pm

@IoEstasCedonta look to Dr. Brownstein’s practice for your evidence.

It is no accident that the only cure that the medical industry will administer is one that they can sell. There is your limiting factor on cures in industry.

ie) Colostrum

hering65 January 24, 2012 at 2:04 pm

frogs in a well…they believe in what they want to ….

IoEstasCedonta January 24, 2012 at 2:57 pm

@mooseasaurusrex So what’s your understanding of the practice? And where’s the evidence of your version working?

anonymous567100 January 24, 2012 at 3:09 pm

@indoctus41

“Drug industry sycophants like Dawkins push what he labels ‘medical science’ to help destroy not only Big Pharma’s competition, but ultimately to limit freedom and choice under the asinine notion of ‘protecting’ us.”

Then why would Richard Dawkins give an award to Bill Maher, a guy who is completely hostile to science-based conventional medicine (which he terms ‘Western Medicine’)? Explain that one to me!

mooseasaurusrex January 24, 2012 at 3:38 pm

This is pro big pharma nonsense and NOT my understanding of the practice.

sceptici January 24, 2012 at 4:10 pm

@indoctus41 They are, the problem is enforcing. In the case of the “alternatives” there are NO rules.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 4:38 pm

@sceptici Sorry but that is such an inane statement from a self-professed skeptic that I can’t waste any more time. Cheers.

sceptici January 24, 2012 at 5:14 pm

@indoctus41 They already do.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 5:31 pm

@sceptici A nanny-state?????? Where did that come from????? You’re not following the thread. Go back and read what I said instead of conceptualizing what I said. I don’t care if General Mills makes medical claims, but if Gov’ts want to coerce alternative medicine to follow arbitrary rules re medical claims it should not ONLY apply to them but also to General Mills. There. I spelled it out for you. Thought it was a given.

sceptici January 24, 2012 at 6:28 pm

@indoctus41 If it bothers you that much, probably, or change the system. Or maybe try to make a complaint at FDA or whoever is in charge. They just might not be aware of the issue or they might just have enough to do already and act on a complaint basis.

I’m sorry if you’d like a nanny-state, the problem with a nanny-state is that it tends to become a tyranical nanny.

Anyway, this has went very far from the discussion and I am not an American citizen, so I am very, very uninterested in this.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 7:12 pm

@sceptici So your solution to the problem (truly remarkable) is that I should sue General Mills and spend tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of my own money to force them to follow what is ALREADY in the health code. That’s a brilliant demonstration of a failed system.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 7:39 pm

@sceptici Exactly. Droga Inc has no interest in pursuing something it can’t protect to recover their R&D and then profit in the short term. That’s a systemic problem, because there are undoubtedly numerous substances on the planet that don’t fall into that category. But it’s worse. Drug industry sycophants like Dawkins push what he labels ‘medical science’ to help destroy not only Big Pharma’s competition, but ultimately to limit freedom and choice under the asinine notion of ‘protecting’ us.

sceptici January 24, 2012 at 8:01 pm

@indoctus41 Of course it is classed as a drug since it claims therapeutic properties. If one wants to sell food, one should not make therapeutic claims. If one does, they should be proved in clinical studies.

I don’t see why you don’t sue that company for fraudulent claim, if you think it is.

Also, I don’t see why you bring up the willfull retardness of people.

sceptici January 24, 2012 at 8:34 pm

@indoctus41 Although patented in the past, patents don’t apply on long term. And although on short term one might benefit, it is a way for the companies to recover the money invested in research. The idea is all companies, no matter the domain of activty will want to gain prophits. The capitalisation is NOT a fault of the pharmaceutic industry, but of capitalism.

There are initiatives to make collaborative and open drug research to counter the problem, but it is still in incipient phase.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 9:31 pm

@sceptici Nothing like misinformation from a skeptic. Ibuprofen was patented in 1961. Laws don’t allow for permanent patents so your point is what??

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 10:23 pm

@sceptici There are truckloads of side effects from pharma drugs, not reported because the system does not promote that. Ask yourself how a drug is eventually determined to be harmful and you should come up with the answer that in many cases it takes years for drugs to be pulled. My sister took a pharma drug for joint pain. She now has no meniscus, NONE, in either knee because THEY didn’t know that’s what it does, it eats away the meniscus. Imagine if alternative medicine did that.

indoctus41 January 24, 2012 at 10:54 pm

@sceptici And worse, any substance that claims a medical benefit is classified as a drug, even food. And yet General Mills places in bold letters on its Honey Nut Cheerios that it “Reduces Cholesterol and May Reduce the Risk of Heart Attack”. Now that sounds like a medical claim to me but the gov’t has no interest in pursuing any action against corps that line politicians’ pockets. Meanwhile the populace distracts itself with meaningless events like Super Bowls and World Series.

Previous post:

Next post: